Nor do I tend to enjoy books with more than two or three perspectives - and this one had fifteen! In less than three-hundred pages! Trying to take a step away from that a second and view what the novel did as a whole, I can't say I enjoyed the story. and stream of consciousness, for me, is rarely any of those things.īut that's just my tastes for the style. I want an author to organize language into a structure that is interesting, compelling, thought-provoking.

I have my own mind that plagues me with this randomness I don't need to read it in someone else's perspective. Honestly, I can think of little more boring than suffering through every thought, feeling and instinct that passes through the human mind. He drops us into scenes and scenarios without any explanation I genuinely felt like Faulkner wanted to deliberately confuse his readers about characters and ideas he could have easily portrayed in a more accessible way. And Faulkner takes it to a whole new level.

I don't mind working at a book if it's hard-going, but this style of narration makes it difficult for me, personally, to ever settle into the rhythm of the book. The first problem is my lack of enthusiasm for stream of consciousness narratives. I think, deep down, I always sensed Faulkner just wasn't for me. But when I've felt in the mood for a classic or something 'literary', I've always passed him up for other authors, even those with 1000+ page monsters. His books always appear on lists of 'best books of all time' and 'books you should read before you die'. I've been working up to a William Faulkner book for years.

As i lay dying text